Southside

Thoughts of a Newtown Socialist

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Tongan Working Class Solidarity

Congratulations to the Tongan working class for realising how the function of Government is to be the servant of the business class. The strike by Tongan public servants has spread to wider protests. According to a reporter from Tonga, who spoke on National Radio's Tagata o te Moana programme last Saturday night, protestors are now targetting leaders of society whether they be from private businesses or the Government.

Tongan public servants are striking for pay rises of 60%, 70% and 80% (depending on the bands of salaries that various workers are in) after senior officials received huge pay increases. Some Tongans in New Zealand have been protesting in solidarity outside the temporary residence of the King of Tonga in Auckland.
King Taufa'ahau Tupou IV is in Auckland for his granddaughter's engagement party.

Tempers have frayed at these protests. Some protestors are not only demanding a decent pay rise for public servants but are calling for the end of the monarchy in Tonga.





PPH
PPH

Monday, August 15, 2005

Immigration Policy - A Double Whammy of Nastiness

I have a sense of deja vu. In 1975 Robert Muldoon and his National Party campaigned on, among other things, immigration and in particular, overstayers. It didn't mattter that at the time, the biggest overstayers were people from Britain - Mr Muldoon was playing on prejudice against Pacific Islanders. They didn't look like Palagi New Zealanders so they could be identified easily - or could they? About a year after the 1975 General Election the Government got the Police to have a blitz on overstayers. The Government denied this but orders were given from somewhere high up. So the Police picked on brown people. Some who were arrested or questioned were Maori. My sister had a friend who was questioned becuase although she was born in New Zealand she was of Samoan descent.

Here we are in 2005 and Don Brash wants to get tough on refugees in particular and immigrants in general. Same sort of story. My workplace has had a welcome influx of British immigrants this year, but no they can't be "identified" like "refugees". This time National is targetting prejudice against Iraqis and Somalis, some of whom have been in New Zealand long enough to have had children here. Children of Iraqi or Somali descent and fourth generation New Zealand Chinese look like immigrants because they obviously don't fit into Dr Brash's image of "mainstream New Zealanders". Sure Dr Brash paid tribute to the contributions of immigrants but who will be able to tell who the "good" immigrants are? National's policy release would make anyone think that lots of immigrants are either bludgers or criminals - a pretty nasty and cynical move to capitalise on or even create prejudice against groups of people who look different.

But there could be more to this nastiness than meets the eye. Sure the Nats want to get New Zealand First votes but I believe that it could be for two reasons. The first is fairly obvious - National wants a fairly free hand to run the country and does not want to be constrained very much by having to rely on New Zealand First for support. After all Don Brash wants to sell all State enterprises except Transpower whereas Winston Peters doesn't want to sell anything.

The second and related reason is that Don Brash wants to push his New Right agenda. To do this he would be better to partner with ACT than with New Zealand First. Those on the free-market right who may be put off by National's remarks about immigrants may find ACT an attractive option. There may be enough such people (socially "liberal") to lift ACT above five percent and therefore give it six seats in Parliament - a great help to the privatisation, use-pays agenda of Dr Brash.

If that happens we will be back to the nastiness and misery of Rogernomics and Ruthanasia - redundancy, people being forced to work longer hours, a further weakening of unions and increased poverty, to name a few.




Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Japanese Parliament Rejects Privatisation

On Monday the Japanese Upper House voted against plans to privatise the postal service, causing the Prime Minister, Junichiro Koiizumi, to call an election. Japan Post employs over 400,000 people and has about 24,700 outlets. Good to see some politicians standing up to New Right reforms. It was reported that what the Upper House was voting against wasn't just the privatisation of the postal service but the whole proposed programme for economic reform.

Interestingly the foreign correspondent on National Radio's Worldwatch programme yesterday evening remarked that privatising Japan Post would probably have little effect on the average Japanese person. How out of touch! She needed to be in New Zealand just after the splitting up and corporatisation of the New Zealand Post Office, when we had closures of hundreds of Post Offices. Maybe Japan Post is already corporatised.

While on privatising postal services, did anyone notice the partial sale of New Zealand Post's courier business? NZ Post has created a joint venture with DHL (Germany's State-owned postal service) whereby each owns a half share in what were NZ Post's courier subsidiaries. Didn't Labour promise that there would be no major State asset sales? This is like selling half of Kiwibank to the ANZ or the Bank of England!

Congratulations to the National Party for showing its true colours again - this time over immigration. This is yet another parallel between this election and the 1975 General Election. Remember Muldoon? Remember dawn raids? More on this later.

Your Comments